Musings on Spiritual Matters

by Matthew Morine

Inappropriate Indirect Communication in Congregations–2

http://amath.colorado.edu/outreach/demos/hshi/2000Sum/triangulation.gifThis process of communication in the above story illustrates “indirect communication.” Instead of going directly to the individual with the difficulty, the person tells another. A more well-known name for this process of communication is called “gossip.” Instead of addressing the issue in a personal and straightforward manner, the person brings in another party to the problem. The technical term for this sinful communication is called “triangulation.” The word triangulation comes from the field of trigonometry. This term refers to a method of surveying a region by dividing it into triangles. An unknown point can be determined by measuring distances between two known points. Relational triangulation occurs when a believer who has a problem with another believer talks to a third party about the problem before talking to the person in question. This is triangulation because it brings in a third party in a matter that is between just two. Triangulation is sinful because of Matthew 18:15 “And if your brother sins, go and reprove him in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother.” The Bible states that when a brother has knowledge of an offense against another brother, he is to go to that person quickly and directly, without talking to another person about the brother about the issue. Failure to go to the brother first about the problem is direct disobedience to the gospel command. If the person goes to someone else first instead of the person that is directly involved in the issue, then there has been committed two sins against him or her. The first sin is that the person has kept the other from knowing there is a problem and robbed him of the opportunity to ask for forgiveness. The second sin is that the person has talked behind the other party’s back. This inappropriate form of communication will always make the problem worse and not better. The first step of any conflict is to go directly to the individual with one’s concerns.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Related posts:

  1. Inappropriate Indirect Communication in Congregations-4
  2. Inappropriate Indirect Communication–Excuses
  3. Inappropriate Indirect Communication in Congregations–1
  4. Emotional Cut Off and Churches
  5. Internet Conflict

About The Author

Matthew is originally from Nova Scotia, Canada. He has a beautiful wife named Charity and a precious baby named Gabrielle. He has graduated from the Brown Trail School of Preaching, Heritage Christian University with his Bachelors of Arts in Biblical Studies, Lipscomb University with his Master’s of Arts in Biblical Studies and his Master’s of Divinity at Freed-Hardeman University. He is presently working towards his Doctorate of Ministry at Harding Graduate School of Religion. His articles have appeared in the World Evangelist, the Highway to Holiness, The West Virginia Christian, The Christian Echo, The Firm Foundation, Church Growth, and the Gospel Advocate. He enjoys hockey, golf, boxing, and chess. In his spare time he enjoys reading numerous genres of books. Also, he is working on climbing all of the 14ers in Colorado. Matthew is the Pulpit Minister for the Castle Rock church of Christ.

Comments

2 Responses to “Inappropriate Indirect Communication in Congregations–2”

    do_action('comment_form
  1. Matthew says:

    The story above is from the previous post on this topic. It is the story of getting in trouble through a process of the information being passed down through various sources.

  2. [...] Inappropriate Indirect Communication in Congregations–2 | Musings … [...]

Leave a Reply